HOW TO CURE CANCER.
All you need to CURE CANCER and save millions of lives is to pay attention to what has been discovered at Harvard, Yale, John Hopkins, Stanford, etc.
These scientists aren’t quacks, snake oil salesmen or witch doctors. The doctors at these institutions are the highest level of medical research that exists.
The REAL SCIENCE TO CURE CANCER is sitting on shelves in the labs of the top medical research institutions.. right now!!! The science exists, but people won’t listen.
So why isn’t anybody doing anything about what they have discovered?
Apathy. - I'm not sick. It doesn’t effect me right now… so who cares?
Ignorance. - It’s hard to understand all this “science “ stuff… so who cares?
Money. - You can not imagine how much is at stake.
Red Tape and Bureaucracy. - It takes decades to overcome the government and get new treatments and drugs to the patients who desperately need them.
The AIDS COCKTAIL is a miracle, not because of the treatment of the disease. But because all the problems I just mentioned were cast aside by doctors who didn’t give a damn about playing by the rules anymore.
Drugs were developed and brought to market at a speed that has never been seen before in the history of medicine.
Decades of useless animal testing and Phase III Clinical Trials were thrown in the toilet, where they belong. Real testing was conducted on human beings.
YEAH THAT’S RIGHT…Straight up human experimentation occurred. And yes, a few eggs got broke in order to make an omelet. People did get hurt as the researchers dialed in the correct dosages of these drugs.
But the reward was clearly worth the risk. Millions of lives have been saved.
IF AIDS DRUGS WERE TREATED THE SAME WAY WE CURRENTLY TREAT CANCER DRUGS, THE FIRST PEOPLE TO RECEIVE THE AIDS COCKTAIL WOULD OCCUR SOMEWHERE 2020 AND 2025.
Today, it takes an average of 12 years from discovery to market for a new drug.
According to medicinenet -
Only 5 in 5,000 drugs that enter preclinical testing progress to human testing. One of these 5 drugs that are tested in people is approved. The chance for a new drug to actually make it to market is thus only 1 in 5,000
If you want to use a new drug in combination with other drugs (like the AIDS cocktail) you have to start the merry-go-round all over again.
And somebody has to pay approximately 1 billion dollars for each new drug.
This is the tragedy. This is what everyone else is doing wrong.
It is obvious that testing of NEW DRUGS on humans could have disastrous consequences. There is good reason for the animal testing and the Phase III Clinical Trial process for NEW DRUGS.
But what about OLD DRUGS, that have been paid for, tested and proven safe? Old drugs that have been approved and prescribed for years, have recently been discovered by Stanford, Johns Hopkins, Harvard etc. to have AMAZING CANCER KILLING PROPERTIES.
What is the excuse for keeping these OLD, SAFE DRUGS out of patient treatment plans and prohibiting doctors from taking the same kinds of risks that were taken with the AIDS COCKTAIL?
What if some of these CANCER FIGHTING DRUGS are so safe they can be bought over the counter at Walmart for 3 dollars a bottle?
BUT DOCTORS STILL AREN’T BEING ALLOWED TO TELL PATIENTS ABOUT THEM OR USE THEM IN PATIENT TREATMENT PROTOCOLS!
WHY!?!?!?!??!?!??!?!?!?
How dangerous can A PINWORM TREATMENT for children be?
Johns Hopkins Medicine -
At a lab on the edge of the Johns Hopkins University's East Baltimore medical campus, researchers grow tumors on mice so they can try and cure them. But one day, the cancer wouldn't grow.
They tried again and again for months. Figuring there must be something different about this batch of mice, they finally discovered the rodents had been given a drug to prevent pinworm.
DO YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT THIS MEANS?...They tried again and again for months....THAT MEANS A SINGLE TREATMENT OF THIS DRUG DIDN'T JUST CURE CANCER - IT GAVE A LONG LASTING IMMUNITY TO CANCER!!!!!!!!!!
Mebendazole is an antiparisitc drug developed in 1972 to treat infections from pinworms, hookworms, roundworms and the like. It has been a very safe and effective drug. We found accidentally that mebendazole has anticancer properties for brain cancers when it was used in our mouse colony to treat pinworm infection.
Dr. Gary Gallia, has run a phase 1 trial to test the safety of this drug in patients newly diagnosed with brain cancer — the situation that Sen. McCain now unfortunately finds himself. While the drug looks promising, not overly toxic and safe, we won’t know for sure if it is really benefiting survival until a much larger (phase 2) trial is performed. Right now we are between trials for the adult patients, looking at the phase 1 results and raising funding for the phase 2. Since there is no drug company backing our trials we raise the money through donations and foundation funding, such as Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure, who funded the phase 1 in adults.
Mebendazole is the human version of this drug, Fenbendazole is veterinary version.
HOUSTON — Late-stage lung cancer. No cure. Three months to live...
“The cancer had spread to my neck, my Right Lung, my stomach, my liver, my bladder, my pancreas and my tail bone. Dozens of tumors,”
Two days after the PET scan, Tippens said a veterinarian friend told him about a dog dewormer called fenbendazole that some people believe cured their cancer.
When Tippens returned to (MD Anderson) for another PET scan in May of 2017, he said the results left his doctors stunned.
“My oncologist was literally stupefied. My PET scan was ‘all clear,’” Tippens said. There were no signs of tumors anywhere in his body.
It sounds a little crazy and too good to be true, but researchers at MD Anderson, Johns Hopkins, the National Institutes of Health and other prestigious medical centers around the world are conducting their own studies on fenbendazole and menbendazole, the human version.
Medicine for dogs studied as possible cancer treatment for people
Indeed, Mebendazole, alone or combined with chemo, has been shown to be effective against multiple forms of cancer cells, such as:
- adrenal cancer (Ref.1, Ref.2)
- colon cancer (Ref.1, Ref.2)
- brain cancer, medulloblastoma, glioblastoma (Ref.1, Ref.2, Ref.3, Ref.4)
- melanoma (Ref.1, Ref.2, Ref.3)
- head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) (Ref.)
- cholangiocarcinoma or bile duct cancer (Ref.)
- gastric cancer (Ref.)
- breast cancer (Ref.)
- lung cancer (Ref.1, Ref.2)
- ovarian (Ref.)
- leukemia (Ref.) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Ref.)
- pancreatic cancer (Ref.)
- fibrosarcoma (Ref.)
A study, showed a high level of activity against leukaemia, colon cancer, CNS and melanoma cell lines, with lesser activity in breast, ovarian, renal and NSCLC lines (Ref.).
Mebendazole: A Cancer Fighting Drug We Find at the Supermarket
We found that MZ inhibited growth of the cells 5-fold compared with that of control cells. The growth-inhibitory effect was not restricted to lung cancer cells, because MZ also profoundly inhibited the growth of breast, ovary, and colon carcinomas and osteosarcomas,
Think about the devastating effects of chemotherapy.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of surgery.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of radiation.. not necessary.
How dangerous can an ASPIRIN based treatment be? (10 times more effective than chemotherapy)
University of Portsmouth
Why do we need 10–15 years of clinical trials for this -
British scientists have found that a new formula containing soluble aspirin could be ten times more effective than chemotherapy in treating brain tumours. Previous cancer drugs have had a problem crossing the blood brain barrier, a membrane which protects the brain but blocks drugs from reaching brain tumours. British experts from the University of Portsmouth and Innovate Pharmaceuticals in Manchester have found that a drink containing soluble aspirin can cross the blood brain barrier and thereby kill cancer cells.
Think about the devastating effects of chemotherapy.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of surgery.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of radiation.. not necessary.
How dangerous can AN ANEMIA (iron deficiency) TREATMENT be?
Stanford University School of Medicine.
Stanford researchers accidentally discovered that iron nanoparticles invented for anemia treatment have another use: triggering the immune system’s ability to destroy tumor cells.
The mouse study found that ferumoxytol prompts immune cells called tumor-associated macrophages to destroy cancer cells, suggesting that the nanoparticles could complement existing cancer treatments.
“It was really surprising to us that the nanoparticles activated macrophages so that they started to attack cancer cells in mice,” said Heike Daldrup-Link, MD,
Ferumoxytol has been in everyday use for the treatment of iron deficiency since 2009. But it remains unused in cancer treatment.
Think about the devastating effects of chemotherapy.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of surgery.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of radiation.. not necessary.
How dangerous can TAGAMET be?
The first reports on the anticancer activity of cimetidine appeared at the end of the 1980s; since then it has been suggested to be effective against a number of tumours including renal carcinomas, melanomas, gastric carcinomas, and colorectal carcinoma
The first reports suggesting a beneficial effect of cimetidine in GI cancer appeared in 1988, when Burtin et al..improved survival of gastric cancer patients to the extent that they survived six times longer (172 ± 113 days) than patients receiving palliative treatment with barbiturates or analgesics (26 ± 16 days, ..
…another multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study by Tonnesen et al. [6]involving 181 patients showed that cimetidine on its own at a normal therapeutic dosage (800 mg/day) also prolonged the survival of gastric cancer patients significantly, …
.. a case study by Taylor et al. [7], even a complete healing was found after 3 weeks of treatment with cimetidine….
… by Adams and Morris [8] …
they found that the immunosuppressive effect of surgery for colorectal carcinomas was reduced by a 5-day pre- and 2-day postoperative treatment with cimetidine (800 mg/day). Somewhat surprisingly, however, they also reported a survival advantage for patients with Dukes A, B and C tumours. At a median 30-month follow-up period, the 3-year mortality in the 7-day cimetidine-treated patients was only 7% as compared with 41% for the non-treated patients.
Matsumoto [9]also performed a randomized, controlled study involving 64 patients,
at a mean 31-month follow-up, period, the 3.9-year survival was significantly higher in the cimetidine-treated group than it was in the untreated group (colon cancer: mortality in the treated group 3.7%, in the untreated group 32%; rectal cancer: mortality in the treated group 0%, in the untreated group 46.7%).
Think about the devastating effects of chemotherapy.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of surgery.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of radiation.. not necessary.
How dangerous can A BLOOD TRANSFUSION be?
Wake Forest University
He injected white blood cells from cancer-resistant mice into non-resistant mice with tumors. Amazing! The tumors shrank and disappeared. More experiments revealed what was killing the tumors: granulocytes, the largest class of white blood cells.
Cui’s second PNAS article, on transferable anticancer immunity appeared in March 2006.
Cui began to seek funding to test the transfusion theory. He already knew support wouldn’t come easily; blood transfusions are old technology and so can’t be patented. The pharmaceutical industry of course would take no interest.
Finally, in 2008, he obtained a grant and FDA approval for a clinical trial at Wake Forest. But shortly before the trial was to start, the university cancelled it without explanation.
Think about the devastating effects of chemotherapy.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of surgery.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of radiation.. not necessary.
How dangerous can a VITAMIN D analog be?
Simultaneously, the patients showed a complete clinical remission, observed respectively for 7, 5 and 4 years. In the series of 10 patients with glioblastomas, 2 cases showed this response; after 4 years, 2 of 10 patients with glioblastomas (20%) were alive; the median survival time is 21 months.
Think about the devastating effects of chemotherapy.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of surgery.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of radiation.. not necessary.
How dangerous can Diclofenac be?
We found that diclofenac treatment (30 mg/kg/bw for 11 days) of mice inoculated with PANC02 cells, reduced the tumor weight by 60%
Think about the devastating effects of chemotherapy.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of surgery.. not necessary.
Think about the devastating effects of radiation.. not necessary.
I can go on and on and on, naming drugs that are on the market, that had the unintended side effect of curing cancer.
But there is no money to be made devising a treatment protocol of cheap, easily affordable drugs.
Everybody is whining about Obamacare… But what if people didn’t need Hospitals and Surgeons to treat cancer?
How much money would that save the healthcare system?
How much money would be added to the economy overall, when a healthy person isn’t removed from it?
It's all about money… for the people that control our lives. It's all about laziness...on our part to allow them to get away with it.
People would rather die than educate themselves and then act upon what they learned.
I give free license to reproduce any or all of this content to anyone, with or without attribution to the author. - That people know this information is all that matters. It's amazing what you can accomplish when you don't care who gets the credit.
